Monday, April 27, 2015

D.V. Tiedeman: Career Decision-Making Theory



David V. Tiedeman and Anna Miller-Tiedeman: published theory in the 1960s

Career Decision-Making Theory

Descriptive: Describe or explain the choices that an individual makes when deciding on a career or some aspect of a career

Prescriptive: Focus on an ideal approach to decision-making

Deep respect for the individual and his/her uniqueness and complexity

Personal reality vs. Common reality
Personal reality: an individual's sense of what is right
Common reality: what others say an individual should do

Two major stages:
1. Anticipating: exploration, crystallization, choice, clarification

Page 7

2. Adjusting: induction, reformation, integration

Page 9

Ann Roe: Personality Development Theory


Ann Roe: published theory in the 1990s

Individuals select their occupation based on biological, sociological, and psychological differences.  These psychological differences originate from children's interactions with their parents.

Roe's classification system:
8 groups
Service
Business contact
Organization
Technology
Outdoor
Science
General culture
Arts and entertainment

6 rows
Represent six different levels of complexity and responsibility for each occupation (the difficulty and complexity of decisions)

Propositions of Roe's theory

  1. Limits of genetic inheritance: intelligence and temperament are hereditary
  2. Limits of sociological and economic factors: race, gender, cultural or social attitudes, economic limits
  3. Development of interests and attitudes: determined by early patterns of satisfactions and frustrations
  4. Determinants of interest: interests are determined by degree of need satisfaction
  5. Development of needs into motivators: the more intense the needs, the more intense the need to become successful
Roe's model of parent-child interaction: 3 toes of parental attitudes
  1. Concentration on the child: overprotective OR overdemanding
  2. Avoidance of the child: rejection OR neglect
  3. Acceptance of the child: Parents encourage independence, do not ignore or reject the child, create a relatively tension-free environment; casual acceptance (low key attitude) OR loving acceptance (affirming, demonstrative, outward show of support)
**NOT supported by research but still shows up in career information.



Friday, February 27, 2015

John Krumboltz: Social Learning Theory of Career Decision Making; Learning Theory of Career Counseling; Planned Happenstance Theory



J. Krumboltz developed the following three theories:

Social Learning Theory of Career Decision Making (1979)

Four factors influence how people choose their career paths:

  1. Genetic endowment and special abilities: innate abilities and physical characteristics
  2. Environmental conditions and events: nature, technology, society, economy, or culture
  3. Learning experiences: instrumental and associative learning
  4. Task approach skills: how people approach the completion of tasks (emotional responses, work habits, personal standards of performance)
The interaction of the factors listed above lead people to develop self-observation generalizations (assessing oneself) and world-view generalizations (assessing one's environment and making predictions about the future).  These factors and generalizations prompt people's behaviors, which then lead to careers.


Learning Theory of Career Counseling (1979, 1990)

A development of the Social Learning Theory of Career Decision Making (described above), applying the theory to career counseling.  Counselors use the theory to help clients make more accurate self-observation generalizations and worldview generalizations, learn new task approach skills, and take appropriate career-related actions.
  • People should expand their capabilities and interests, rather than base decisions on existing characteristics only
  • People should prepare for changing work tasks, rather than static occupations
  • People should feel empowered to take action, rather than receive a diagnosis
  • Career counselors should help clients deal with all career problems, not only occupational selection

Planned Happenstance Theory (Mitchell, Levin, and Krumboltz, 1999)

The idea that people can prepare for and create opportunities for unexpected events that lead to career selection and success.  Career counselors should help clients develop curiosity, persistence, flexibility, optimism, and risk-taking.  Exploring one’s options, interests, and abilities generates opportunities for improving one’s quality of life, and developing necessary skills allows one to seize opportunities when they arise.

Indecision vs. Open-mindedness: Indecision implies that the client is paralyzed and unable to able to make a choice, whereas open-mindedness implies that the client is willing to explore interests and career paths that they may not have considered otherwise.

Restrictiveness of congruence: Do not allow congruence to be a barrier to a client seeking a certain occupation.

https://www.grinnell.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Krumboltz.pdf

Gail Hackett: Social Cognitive Career Theory

In 1994, R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett developed the Social Cognitive Career Theory: "Self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectancies both predict academic and career interests" (Gybsers, 2009, p. 34).  The theory is based on the foundational work of theorist A. Bandura.

Self-efficacy beliefs: people's judgments of their capabilities to organize and execute courses of action required to attain designated types of performance

Outcome expectancies: personal beliefs about probable response outcomes

  1. A person's beliefs about their abilities and about probably outcomes lead to the development of interests;
  2. Interests predict goals that lead to the selection and practice of activities;
  3. Activities lead to goal fulfillment and feelings of success




Steven D. Brown: Social Cognitive Career Theory

 In 1994, R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett developed the Social Cognitive Career Theory: "Self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectancies both predict academic and career interests" (Gybsers, 2009, p. 34).  The theory is based on the foundational work of theorist A. Bandura.

Self-efficacy beliefs: people's judgments of their capabilities to organize and execute courses of action required to attain designated types of performance

Outcome expectancies: personal beliefs about probable response outcomes

  1. A person's beliefs about their abilities and about probably outcomes lead to the development of interests;
  2. Interests predict goals that lead to the selection and practice of activities;
  3. Activities lead to goal fulfillment and feelings of success

Robert W. Lent: Social Cognitive Career Theory


In 1994, R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett developed the Social Cognitive Career Theory: "Self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectancies both predict academic and career interests" (Gybsers, 2009, p. 34).  The theory is based on the foundational work of theorist A. Bandura.

Self-efficacy beliefs: people's judgments of their capabilities to organize and execute courses of action required to attain designated types of performance

Outcome expectancies: personal beliefs about probable response outcomes
  1. A person's beliefs about their abilities and about probably outcomes lead to the development of interests;
  2. Interests predict goals that lead to the selection and practice of activities;
  3. Activities lead to goal fulfillment and feelings of success



Monday, February 9, 2015

John Holland: Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments


http://www.careerkey.org/choose-a-career/hollands-theory-of-career-choice.html#.VNkorVqyjlI

In the 1950s, John Holland theorized that personality and work environment are measurable, and that the two should be matched in order to find a satisfying career.  Holland's theory describes six basic personality types (RIASEC, described below).  One type is typically dominant; an individual's top three types -- in order -- make up that person's Holland Code.  The goal is to match an individual's code, or personality type, with his or her career.

  • Realistic: Working with things is more important than working with people; concrete thinkers rather than abstract
  • Investigative: Curious; focused on the outcome and abstract ideas; interested in independent, cerebral work
  • Artistic: creative, expressive, and personally open; vulnerable; interested in the means rather than the end
  • Social: People-oreinted; focus on service to others; solves problems by interacting with other people and reaching a consensus
  • Enterprising: People-oriented; interested in influencing people more than helping people; interested in wealth
  • Conventional: More conservative in the work environment; good fit for organized, planning, and support positions; places importance on following the rules
Other points:

  • Congruence: The relationship of the personality to the work environment
  • Consistency: The relatedness of personality type and work environment
  • Differentiated vs. undifferentiated: An individual's code is differentiated when his or her three-letter code "clusters" to one side of the hexagon, revealing that there is little tension between his or her personality traits.  Career selection for this individual is more focused on how to use his or her interests and abilities in a chosen career.  An individual's code is undifferentiated when his or her three-letter code does not cluster to one side of the hexagon.  Rather, two or three of his or her traits are in tension with each other.  Individuals with undifferentiated codes may need to focus on the the most dominant personality trait when selecting a career and find other ways outside of work to satisfy the other aspects of his or her personality.
Career assessments:
  • Self-Directed Search (SDS)
  • Strong Interest Inventory